tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6747272934569803137.post8716627752912254668..comments2011-08-16T10:56:48.653-07:00Appiriohttp://www.blogger.com/profile/15774523927536637030noreply@blogger.comBlogger12125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6747272934569803137.post-82293922685702120492011-08-16T08:59:54.228-07:002011-08-16T08:59:54.228-07:00Hi Praveen - that&#39;s not possible, if you follow my suggestion in this blog. If you&#39;re not actually showing a search box, but rather an image of a search box, there&#39;s no way a fake search box is going to get the cursor! You should probably re-read this blog. If you still have issues, please contact me directly (glenn at appirio.com).Glenn Weinsteinhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/02773537677405814994noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6747272934569803137.post-27115125558511869262011-08-16T03:36:58.908-07:002011-08-16T03:36:58.908-07:00It&#39;s not working the cursor still goes back to the search box.<br /><br />Regards,<br />Praveen JaswalAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6747272934569803137.post-26962269270759141472011-02-03T10:54:48.190-08:002011-02-03T10:54:48.190-08:00Glad to help Jimmy!Glennhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/02773537677405814994noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6747272934569803137.post-45512653060244578812011-02-03T09:46:47.434-08:002011-02-03T09:46:47.434-08:00Thank you Glenn, I just did some more testing with your code and results and the standard search in our Prod enviornment and get the same results.<br /><br />FYI, what was throwing me off was I knew that in my prod org i recalled seeing opps in the search results when I searched on a company name. It&#39;s because a related list on the opp contains the account name, the related list is &quot;partners&quot; but not all our accounts have this populated. <br /><br />I did not use the same comany in testing and the firms i was using did not have the Partners related list populated.<br /><br />Again, thanks for the code and the response, greatly appreciated by this non developer.<br /><br />JimmyJimmynoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6747272934569803137.post-76194206246998289702011-02-02T16:12:56.494-08:002011-02-02T16:12:56.494-08:00Hi Jimmy - I think that&#39;s just how advanced search works in SFDC. According to the SFDC help file (https://help.salesforce.com/apex/HTViewHelpDoc?id=search_fields.htm&amp;language=en#Opportunities), advanced search only searches 2 fields on Opportunity records: name and description. So if you search an a company name, you&#39;ll only get opportunities back as results if the company name appears in the opportunity name or description.Glennhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/02773537677405814994noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6747272934569803137.post-67875049954134213692011-02-02T15:25:15.222-08:002011-02-02T15:25:15.222-08:00Hi Glenn, thanks for this even more handy now that we&#39;re testing chatter and not happy with the new search functionality.<br /><br />However, the one object that is not represented is Opportunities, i can search for an opp by name and get the result, but if i search for an account and there is an opp on the account i&#39;m not getting the opp back on the results only the account reluts, might you know why?<br /><br />Thanks,<br /><br />JimmyJimmynoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6747272934569803137.post-20425185967736992952011-01-04T16:03:35.661-08:002011-01-04T16:03:35.661-08:00Rillu - I&#39;d be happy to try and help. Email me at glenn (at) appirio.com with further details. Were you able to get it to work in regular (non-portal) SFDC?Glennhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/02773537677405814994noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6747272934569803137.post-25801033996409192662011-01-04T02:51:55.827-08:002011-01-04T02:51:55.827-08:00I have used this in a component for a customer portal, but the search results are not being displayed. Kindly help me.rilluhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/08544004261773720673noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6747272934569803137.post-6678727025931045032010-05-07T11:34:25.245-07:002010-05-07T11:34:25.245-07:00Wow. This is *such* a timesaver. Thanks for putting this out there, you guys!Marc Bhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/01044921925220364821noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6747272934569803137.post-35104987620736888132010-04-25T16:34:05.885-07:002010-04-25T16:34:05.885-07:00Hi Anonymous - this code actually replaces the previous code.Glennhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/17786913153493086680noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6747272934569803137.post-7068225211983671342010-04-19T14:16:02.184-07:002010-04-19T14:16:02.184-07:00Can you post an explanation of how to splice this code into the previous code? For us HTML-newbies, that is?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6747272934569803137.post-43643119456538359932010-03-30T13:02:58.239-07:002010-03-30T13:02:58.239-07:00Wow... Wow! You guys are my heroes. Thank you - both from me (who removed the search component because of the issue with focus stealing) and from my users (for allowing me to add it back in).Johan Liljegrenhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/16822726513881675605noreply@blogger.com